p0tat0es: (Default)
potatoes ([personal profile] p0tat0es) wrote2001-12-18 12:19 pm

(no subject)

Hrm. Just heard a little blurb that Mumia's sentence was thrown out. He was still referred to as 'cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal' by the reporter.

That's all.

[identity profile] harperwilla.livejournal.com 2001-12-18 12:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks for this, you. It cheered my day right up.

And to reply to artboy up there - Judge Yohn said he didn't have the jurisdiction to overturn the conviction, but since it's no longer a death penalty case (which was his main argument, as I understood it), wouldn't he, or a similar judge have the jurisdiction now?

I'll be surprised if this doesn't somehow end up in a new trial. Thank god Tom Ridge is out of Pennsylvania...

[identity profile] circumambulate.livejournal.com 2001-12-18 01:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I dunno, perhaps. I wasn't expressing an opinion, just trying to clarify why the reporter might have used those terms. I haven't found any info on why the judge dismissed the other appeals, only that he had. Where are you looking?

I don't know that I really have an opinion on his guilt, or innocence, I've never been able to find any information that discusses the issue objectively, and there are compelling arguments, on both sides. I think it's pretty clear that he wasn't well represented, at trial. But, whether that was negligent enough to warrant a new trial, I don't know.

At least the death sentence was overturned, and for that, I'm glad.

Re:

[identity profile] harperwilla.livejournal.com 2001-12-18 01:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I have no idea whether or not he's guilty. But I've read enough to believe that he deserves a new trial.

Horrifying, either way, how our system can drag on for twenty years, while deciding whether or not to kill a man. But you're right. I'm glad he's off death row. Most definitely.