FUCK!

Jul. 20th, 2001 02:57 pm
p0tat0es: (Default)
[personal profile] p0tat0es

A protester lies dead on the road after being shot by Italian police during rioting in central Genoa July 20, 2001. Police fired live rounds, tear gas and used water cannons in an attempt to disperse the thousands of protestors who are demonstrating against the G8 summit.


'borrowed' from Go2Net.com

Date: 2001-07-20 03:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] circumambulate.livejournal.com
They need to remember that they aren't in the US, anymore. Police carry automatic weapons, in most European countries, and they have NO sense of humor.

Date: 2001-07-20 08:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beulah.livejournal.com
but,
does that somehow make it o.k. that this boy is dead?

Date: 2001-07-20 08:42 pm (UTC)

Date: 2001-07-21 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] circumambulate.livejournal.com
Loss of life is always unfortunate, but put this picture with it:


That boy killed himself, as surely as if his own finger had pulled the trigger. What do you think would have happened had that mob succeeded in pulling those policemen out of their jeep?

Date: 2001-07-22 11:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veganguy.livejournal.com
They always have the option of nonlethal weapons or, as a last defense, to shoot to disable. Unless the policemen had a gun pointed at their heads, they should never shoot to kill. This is why the policeman who shot the boy is now under investigation for homicide.

Date: 2001-07-22 12:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] circumambulate.livejournal.com
Shooting to disable is the stuff of movies. It does not exist in real life. In real life, where you have adrenaline, and personal threat involved, trained marksman only land about 1 in 10 shots on their target. Christ, look at the situation in your own city, last week. Policmen fired off 20 rounds at each other, and none of them were wounded.

And, consider the situation. 1 man laying in the back of a jeep, one man standing outside, very close to the vehicle, the only targets would have been from the upper torso, up. What's he going to do, get up, lean out the window, and aim for a leg? Also, you're assuming that the policeman had some form of non-lethal defense at his disposal.

This was a bad situation, all the way around, and demonizing the police serves no useful purpose. Maybe the shooting was justified, maybe it was not, nobody knows except the people who were there. All that I do know is that, in my opinion, that boy was participating in activities that go beyond the scope of reasonable demonstration. He was threatening other lives, and was putting himself in harm's way. He paid the price.

Re:

Date: 2001-07-23 12:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veganguy.livejournal.com
"Also, you're assuming that the policeman had some form of non-lethal defense at his disposal."
I believe policemen are required to carry non-lethal defense, so it should have been at his disposal.
"...demonizing the police serves no useful purpose"
Did you happen to see this on your evening news?

Cell phone call ins, and indy reports are keeping us updated with events from Genova. An hour ago, POLICE STORMED the building that hosted the IMC with tear gas and batons, and the building opposite that hosted other GSF groups. About ten people escaped from windows. The police held people and took IDs. According to the medics on the scene, there have been approximately 20 seriously injured people from police violence. Corporate media have been reporting 3 dead, but those reports have NOT been confirmed, and medics said this was not true. Blood which stained the streets outside the imc quickly disappeared. Numbers of people arrested have not been relased yet The school opposite the IMC building was where the worst police violence occured. Floors are covered in blood. Police assault lasted over 45 minutes. Several people have been carried out in black bags. The people in the street were chanting en masse "fascist" and "bastardo". The wounded were carried out on strechers continuously and taken to ambulances that arrived with the police. Police sealed off street by surprise and a helicopter remained low overhead like a military operation. A temporary hospital was set up on the 1st floor of the IMC building to treat wounded.
Full story here (http://www.indymedia.org/)

Date: 2001-07-23 02:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] circumambulate.livejournal.com
Let me be very clear. I'm not talking about the actions of the police in Genoa, in general. It would appear that they were being far too heavy handed.

I'm talking about this specific incident which, to me, appears within the realms of justification. And, again, appears to be. No one who wasn't there has enough information to make any kind of judgement.

As soon as it turns violent, situations like that stop becoming a clash of politics, and start being a clash of individuals.

Re:

Date: 2001-07-23 05:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veganguy.livejournal.com
I agree.

Date: 2001-07-23 01:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tehschkott.livejournal.com
no d00d, you're wrong. if the police are executing a non-lethal maneuver to combat a situation like this, then it is the police force as a body that are taking a specified course of action. this is a case where one riot officer took it upon himself to use lethal force. that officer was terribly wrong.

the success or failure of this riot control exercise certainly did not hinge on this one officer or his personal decision to use lethal force when everyone else seemed to have no problem following their orders and maintaining non-lethal levels. this boy was part of a body of rioters. these officers were a part of a body of riot controllers. this one cop took it upon himself to kill this boy, to act as judge, jury, and executioner even when his superiors and the goverening body at large both decided to use non-lethal force. this cop was fuckin wrong.

it is not up to you to decide what is excessive protest and it was not up to that officer.

at some point in all this, these riot officers decided to shoot someone so they could make their getaway. it is likely that if they had the time to formulate a plan of action and then shoot someone while sitting in the drivers seat at point blank range, that there was time to point it somewhere other then this mans head.

the head is a very small target, it moves around alot, and it is round. it does not make a good target and it takes effort to hit it, either at a distance or at close range.

a gunshot wound to the head is a malicious act, especially at close range. it takes an effort. it is extremely hard to do accidentally.

it sure as hell wasn't within the cops scope of operation to collect on the payment you say that boy owed.

it's policemen and people in power with your kind of attitude that manufacture dead boys in streets all around the world.

Date: 2001-07-23 02:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] circumambulate.livejournal.com
this is a case where one riot officer took it upon himself to use lethal force. that officer was terribly wrong. I disagree. I staunchly believe that any officer faced with threat of death has the discretion to use lethal force, if necessary.

it is not up to you to decide what is excessive protest and it was not up to that officer.
It is absolutely up to me to decide, and for you to decide. Violent protest damages the cause of peaceful protest. It relegates all of the protesters to the level of violent thugs, in many minds. It is self defeating, and wrong.

it's policemen and people in power with your kind of attitude that manufacture dead boys in streets all around the world. You make assumptions about my politics, which are incorrect. You do the spirit of protest a disservice by holding this thug up as some kind of martyr.

Date: 2001-07-23 04:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tehschkott.livejournal.com
yah? does that boy have the right to defend himself with lethal force if necessary? or is the cop the only one?

that cop killed a protestor against his superiors orders, against the orders of the government, and against the spirit of non-lethal protest. that cop turned this into something brutally deadly. that cop. only him. nobody else. just this one single cop. how many cops were killed in these riots? none. what does that mean? gee i wonder.

being a riot control cop isn't like some hippie dippie episode of Lethal Weapon man. they are soldiers. soldiers follow orders. when soldiers dont follow orders then people die. period.

last i checked the protestors didn't have firearms or handguns and that boy was no exception.

and no man, i'm not making assumptions about your politics. it's really unfortunate, but i'm not. listen to yourself. you sound like a maniac trying to defend a screwed up position.

You make assumptions about my politics, which are incorrect. You do the spirit of protest a disservice by holding this thug up as some kind of martyr.

please tell us all about your politics so we don't make any more assumptions. tell us about how its okay for cops to kill or brutalize protestors at their discression, and tell us about how government relegated protest is an efficient form of protest. tell us how its your right to decide whether or not protestors live or die based solely upon what you believe is a 'suitable' amount of demonstration. and please tell me where i'm making assumptions here. and remember when phrasing your answers, please do so as if you are adressing this boys mother, his family, his friends, etc...

this isn't about thugs and martyrs. this is about protest. non-lethal action in direct opposition to a committed wrong. this boy was protesting. that cop shot him for his ideas. please explain how that makes it right.

It is absolutely up to me to decide. Violent protest damages the cause of peaceful protest. It relegates all of the protesters to the level of violent thugs, in many minds. It is self defeating, and wrong.

okay, so explain to me again how this cop is the champion of non-lethal protest by shooting this boy again? i'm very confused at this part. waitaminute... this guy wasn't a protestor, he was just a thug right?

and yes i'll say it again

it's policemen and people in power with your kind of attitude that manufacture dead boys in streets all around the world.

Date: 2001-07-20 06:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sillyape.livejournal.com
If you want what's going on, look here: Indymedia Italy.

Date: 2001-07-20 08:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rockstarbob.livejournal.com
godfuckingdamnit.

i'm going to cry or puke.

or both.

all i can say is:

Date: 2001-07-21 12:01 am (UTC)

March 2015

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 01:19 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios